2003 Proton 400 vs. 2010 Honda Civic

To start off, 2010 Honda Civic is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Honda Civic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Civic (138 HP) has 64 more horse power than 2003 Proton 400. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 2003 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Civic weights approximately 350 kg more than 2003 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Honda Civic (174 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton 400. (108 Nm). This means 2010 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton 400. 2010 Honda Civic has automatic transmission and 2003 Proton 400 has manual transmission. 2003 Proton 400 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Honda Civic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: