2003 Proton 400 vs. 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet
To start off, 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet (99 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2003 Proton 400. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet should accelerate faster than 2003 Proton 400.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Proton 400 | 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet | |
Make | Proton | Aston Martin |
Model | 400 | Cygnet |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 99 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |