2003 Proton 400 vs. 2012 Audi A1
To start off, 2012 Audi A1 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi A1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A1 (104 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2003 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A1 should accelerate faster than 2003 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Audi A1 weights approximately 70 kg more than 2003 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi A1 (250 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Audi A1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Proton 400 | 2012 Audi A1 | |
Make | Proton | Audi |
Model | 400 | A1 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3954 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1416 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2469 mm |