2003 Proton 400 vs. 2012 Fiat Bravo

To start off, 2012 Fiat Bravo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Fiat Bravo (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2003 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 2003 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 445 kg more than 2003 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Fiat Bravo (290 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton 400.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Proton 400 2012 Fiat Bravo
Make Proton Fiat
Model 400 Bravo
Year Released 2003 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1297 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 74 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 108 Nm 290 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 1500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 990 kg 1435 kg
Vehicle Length 4280 mm 4340 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1500 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2610 mm