2003 Proton Impian vs. 1992 Rover 620i
To start off, 2003 Proton Impian is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 620i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 620i would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Rover 620i is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Rover 620i (113 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2003 Proton Impian. (101 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Rover 620i should accelerate faster than 2003 Proton Impian. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Rover 620i weights approximately 50 kg more than 2003 Proton Impian. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Rover 620i (172 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton Impian. (140 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1992 Rover 620i will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton Impian.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Proton Impian | 1992 Rover 620i | |
| Make | Proton | Rover |
| Model | Impian | 620i |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1992 |
| Engine Size | 1584 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 113 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1390 mm |
