2003 Renault Clio vs. 1944 Simca 5
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Simca 5 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Clio (251 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 1944 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1944 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Clio weights approximately 966 kg more than 1944 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Renault Clio | 1944 Simca 5 | |
Make | Renault | Simca |
Model | Clio | 5 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1944 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2946 cc | 570 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 14 HP |
Engine RPM | 7150 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 564 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1280 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2010 mm |