2003 Renault Clio vs. 1957 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Clio (111 HP) has 71 more horse power than 1957 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1957 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 190 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Renault Clio | 1957 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Clio | Master RR |
Year Released | 2003 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 40 HP |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2540 mm |