2003 Renault Clio vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Clio (96 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Clio weights approximately 15 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Volvo 220 (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1962 Volvo 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Renault Clio | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Renault | Volvo |
| Model | Clio | 220 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 127 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 45 L |
