2003 Renault Clio vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Renault Clio | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Renault | Ford |
| Model | Clio | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4690 mm |
