2003 Renault Clio vs. 1985 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Clio (96 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1985 Ford Tempo. (90 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1985 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Ford Tempo weights approximately 75 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1985 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Renault Clio | 1985 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Renault | Ford |
Model | Clio | Tempo |
Year Released | 2003 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2540 mm |