2003 Renault Clio vs. 1989 Volvo 245
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Volvo 245. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Volvo 245 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Clio (251 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1989 Volvo 245. (110 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1989 Volvo 245.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Clio (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Volvo 245. (157 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Volvo 245.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Renault Clio | 1989 Volvo 245 | |
Make | Renault | Volvo |
Model | Clio | 245 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2946 cc | 2316 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 7150 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4650 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2660 mm |