2003 Renault Clio vs. 1996 Toyota Celica

To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,762 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota Celica (114 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota Celica weights approximately 65 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota Celica (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1996 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio. 2003 Renault Clio has automatic transmission and 1996 Toyota Celica has manual transmission. 1996 Toyota Celica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Renault Clio will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: