2003 Renault Clio vs. 2002 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Megane would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Clio (96 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2002 Renault Megane. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Megane weights approximately 220 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Clio (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Megane. (99 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Megane. 2003 Renault Clio has automatic transmission and 2002 Renault Megane has manual transmission. 2002 Renault Megane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Renault Clio will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Renault Clio | 2002 Renault Megane | |
Make | Renault | Renault |
Model | Clio | Megane |
Year Released | 2003 | 2002 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 99 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.9 seconds | 9.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.8 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.3 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |