2003 Renault Clio vs. 2012 BMW 640
To start off, 2012 BMW 640 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 BMW 640 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW 640 (311 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW 640 should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW 640 weights approximately 845 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 BMW 640 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 BMW 640. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW 640 (630 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 482 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2012 BMW 640 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio. 2012 BMW 640 has automatic transmission and 2003 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2003 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 BMW 640 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Renault Clio | 2012 BMW 640 | |
Make | Renault | BMW |
Model | Clio | 640 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 630 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.6 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 84 mm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.6 seconds | 5.4 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 5007 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1894 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1392 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2968 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 5.6 L/100km | 4.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.3 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 70 L |