2003 Renault Clio vs. 2012 Citroen C3
To start off, 2012 Citroen C3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Citroen C3 (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Citroen C3 weights approximately 378 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C3 (245 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2012 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio. 2003 Renault Clio has automatic transmission and 2012 Citroen C3 has manual transmission. 2012 Citroen C3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Renault Clio will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Renault Clio | 2012 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Renault | Citroen |
Model | Clio | C3 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.9 seconds | 12.4 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1408 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.3 L/100km | 4.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 50 L |