2003 Renault Grand Espace vs. 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2003 Renault Grand Espace is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 208 kg more than 2003 Renault Grand Espace.
Because 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Grand Espace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Renault Grand Espace | 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
Make | Renault | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Grand Espace | Silver Cloud |
Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2187 cc | 6230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 2108 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3070 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 81 L |