2003 Renault Grand Scenic vs. 1979 Zastava 1500

To start off, 2003 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Grand Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Grand Scenic (134 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1979 Zastava 1500. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Grand Scenic should accelerate faster than 1979 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Grand Scenic weights approximately 470 kg more than 1979 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1979 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Grand Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Grand Scenic (201 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Grand Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Zastava 1500. 2003 Renault Grand Scenic has automatic transmission and 1979 Zastava 1500 has manual transmission. 1979 Zastava 1500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Renault Grand Scenic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: