2003 Renault Grand Scenic vs. 2005 Toyota Opa
To start off, 2005 Toyota Opa is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Grand Scenic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Grand Scenic would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Grand Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Grand Scenic weights approximately 310 kg more than 2005 Toyota Opa.
Because 2005 Toyota Opa is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Renault Grand Scenic. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Opa will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Renault Grand Scenic | 2005 Toyota Opa | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | Grand Scenic | Opa |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1870 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1530 mm |
