2003 Renault Kangoo vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2003 Renault Kangoo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,783 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Kangoo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Kangoo (64 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1968 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo should accelerate faster than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Because 1968 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Kangoo (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Kangoo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Renault Kangoo | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Renault | ZAZ |
| Model | Kangoo | 966 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1783 cc | 887 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2170 mm |
