2003 Renault Kangoo vs. 1972 Toyota Celica

To start off, 2003 Renault Kangoo is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,783 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Kangoo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Toyota Celica (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (64 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Kangoo.

Because 1972 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Toyota Celica (137 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1972 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Kangoo.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Renault Kangoo 1972 Toyota Celica
Make Renault Toyota
Model Kangoo Celica
Year Released 2003 1972
Body Type Panel Van Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1783 cc 1589 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 64 HP 106 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 118 Nm 137 Nm
Torque RPM 2250 RPM 4200 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 21.5:1 9.4:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4060 mm 4170 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1610 mm
Vehicle Height 1850 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2430 mm