2003 Renault Kangoo vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Kangoo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Kangoo would be higher. Both 2003 Renault Kangoo and 2010 Renault Clio are equipped with a 1,149 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Kangoo (74 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Kangoo (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Kangoo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Renault Kangoo | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Renault | Renault |
Model | Kangoo | Clio |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Panel Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1149 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 105 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 69 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.8 mm | 76.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2480 mm |