2003 Renault Koleos vs. 1946 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2003 Renault Koleos is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1946 Volvo PV 60 (85 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2003 Renault Koleos. (75 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1946 Volvo PV 60 should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Koleos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Koleos weights approximately 131 kg more than 1946 Volvo PV 60.
Because 2003 Renault Koleos is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Volvo PV 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Koleos will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Renault Koleos | 1946 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Renault | Volvo |
| Model | Koleos | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1946 |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1761 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2850 mm |
