2003 Renault Megane vs. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom (164 HP) has 67 more horse power than 2003 Renault Megane. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Megane.
Because 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Renault Megane | 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Renault | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Megane | Phantom |
Year Released | 2003 | 1950 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1389 cc | 5673 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 164 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 114.3 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3690 mm |