2003 Renault Megane vs. 1965 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 1,897 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 80 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Toyota Crown weights approximately 35 kg more than 2003 Renault Megane.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Megane (188 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Toyota Crown. (146 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Renault Megane | 1965 Toyota Crown | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | Megane | Crown |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1459 cc | 1897 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 80 HP | 80 HP |
| Torque | 188 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 85 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 75 L |
