2003 Renault Megane vs. 2010 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2010 GMC Canyon is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Megane would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 GMC Canyon (186 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2003 Renault Megane. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Megane.
Because 2010 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 GMC Canyon (258 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Megane. (152 Nm). This means 2010 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Renault Megane | 2010 GMC Canyon | |
Make | Renault | GMC |
Model | Megane | Canyon |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 186 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 258 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 72 L |