2003 Renault Megane vs. 2011 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2011 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Megane would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 2003 Renault Megane. (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Megane.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Megane. (127 Nm). This means 2011 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Renault Megane | 2011 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Renault | Mazda |
Model | Megane | CX-9 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1389 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 366 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5085 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 76 L |