2003 Renault Megane vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Megane would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 233 more horse power than 2003 Renault Megane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 627 kg more than 2003 Renault Megane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Megane. (186 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Megane. 2013 Cadillac XTS has automatic transmission and 2003 Renault Megane has manual transmission. 2003 Renault Megane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac XTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Renault Megane | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
Make | Renault | Cadillac |
Model | Megane | XTS |
Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 358 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1817 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2831 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 3.9 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 5.5 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.5 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 72 L |