2003 Renault Megane vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Megane would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (459 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 325 more horse power than 2003 Renault Megane. (134 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 916 kg more than 2003 Renault Megane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (630 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 446 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Megane. (184 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Megane. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 2003 Renault Megane has manual transmission. 2003 Renault Megane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Renault Megane | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Renault | Jeep |
| Model | Megane | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1948 cc | 6400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 459 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 630 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 2336 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2156 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1756 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2916 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 6.5 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 17.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 93 L |
