2003 Renault Scenic II vs. 2009 Renault Megane
To start off, 2009 Renault Megane is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Scenic II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Scenic II would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Megane (112 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2003 Renault Scenic II. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Scenic II.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Megane (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Scenic II. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Scenic II.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Renault Scenic II | 2009 Renault Megane | |
Make | Renault | Renault |
Model | Scenic II | Megane |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Top Speed | 169 km/hour | 193 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 14.3 seconds | 11.1 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |