2003 Seat Alhambra vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2003 Seat Alhambra is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Seat Alhambra (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Seat Alhambra should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Seat Alhambra weights approximately 495 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Seat Alhambra (214 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Seat Alhambra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Seat Alhambra | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Seat | Triumph |
Model | Alhambra | 2000 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 214 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 64 L |