2003 Seat Inca Kombi vs. 1982 Seat Ronda
To start off, 2003 Seat Inca Kombi is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat Ronda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat Ronda would be higher. At 1,391 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Seat Inca Kombi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Seat Ronda (61 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2003 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Seat Ronda should accelerate faster than 2003 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Seat Inca Kombi weights approximately 135 kg more than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Seat Inca Kombi (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat Ronda. (88 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Seat Inca Kombi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Seat Inca Kombi | 1982 Seat Ronda | |
Make | Seat | Seat |
Model | Inca Kombi | Ronda |
Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1391 cc | 1193 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 61 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 107 Nm | 88 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 900 kg |