2003 Seat Inca Kombi vs. 1986 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2003 Seat Inca Kombi is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 1,391 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Seat Inca Kombi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Seat Inca Kombi (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1986 Volkswagen Polo. (44 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Seat Inca Kombi should accelerate faster than 1986 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Seat Inca Kombi weights approximately 265 kg more than 1986 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Seat Inca Kombi (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Volkswagen Polo. (95 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Seat Inca Kombi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Volkswagen Polo.

Compare all specifications: