2003 Seat Inca Kombi vs. 2012 Ford Ka
To start off, 2012 Ford Ka is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Seat Inca Kombi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Seat Inca Kombi would be higher. At 1,391 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Seat Inca Kombi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Ka (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2003 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 2003 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Seat Inca Kombi weights approximately 95 kg more than 2012 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Seat Inca Kombi (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford Ka. (102 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Seat Inca Kombi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Seat Inca Kombi | 2012 Ford Ka | |
Make | Seat | Ford |
Model | Inca Kombi | Ka |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1391 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 107 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 940 kg |