2003 Seat Inca Kombi vs. 2012 Volvo XC90

To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Seat Inca Kombi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Seat Inca Kombi would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo XC90 (240 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 2003 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2003 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1120 kg more than 2003 Seat Inca Kombi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2012 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Seat Inca Kombi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Seat Inca Kombi. (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Seat Inca Kombi. 2012 Volvo XC90 has automatic transmission and 2003 Seat Inca Kombi has manual transmission. 2003 Seat Inca Kombi will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo XC90 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: