2003 Skoda Octavia vs. 2011 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2011 Fisker Karma is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Skoda Octavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Skoda Octavia would be higher.
Because 2011 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Skoda Octavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Skoda Octavia | 2011 Fisker Karma | |
Make | Skoda | Fisker |
Model | Octavia | Karma |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1331 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3160 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 36 L |