2003 Skoda Octavia vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Skoda Octavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Skoda Octavia would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (165 HP) has 64 more horse power than 2003 Skoda Octavia. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 2003 Skoda Octavia.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Skoda Octavia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Skoda Octavia (240 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (230 Nm). This means 2003 Skoda Octavia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Skoda Octavia | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Skoda | Chevrolet |
Model | Octavia | Captiva |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 230 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2707 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 65 L |