2003 Skoda Superb vs. 1978 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2003 Skoda Superb is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 2,769 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Skoda Superb is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Skoda Superb (190 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Skoda Superb should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Skoda Superb weights approximately 616 kg more than 1978 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1978 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Skoda Superb, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Skoda Superb (280 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2003 Skoda Superb will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications: