2003 Smart Roadster vs. 1965 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2003 Smart Roadster is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Zastava 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Smart Roadster (100 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1965 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Smart Roadster should accelerate faster than 1965 Zastava 1500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Smart Roadster (130 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Smart Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Smart Roadster | 1965 Zastava 1500 | |
| Make | Smart | Zastava |
| Model | Roadster | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 698 cc | 1294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 130 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3430 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2430 mm |
