2003 Spyker C8 vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 4,170 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1149 kg more than 2003 Spyker C8.
Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Spyker C8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Spyker C8 | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Spyker | Jeep |
| Model | C8 | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4170 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 286 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1215 kg | 2364 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4821 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2154 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1763 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2916 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 93 L |
