2003 SsangYong Korando vs. 1982 Zastava 750
To start off, 2003 SsangYong Korando is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 2,295 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 SsangYong Korando (138 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 750.
Because 2003 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Zastava 750. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 SsangYong Korando (209 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 SsangYong Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
2003 SsangYong Korando | 1982 Zastava 750 | |
Make | SsangYong | Zastava |
Model | Korando | 750 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 2295 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 55 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2010 mm |