2003 SsangYong Korando vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 SsangYong Korando. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 SsangYong Korando would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (548 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 331 more horse power than 2003 SsangYong Korando. (217 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2003 SsangYong Korando. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 49 kg more than 2003 SsangYong Korando. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Cadillac CTS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (747 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 439 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 SsangYong Korando. (308 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 SsangYong Korando. 2003 SsangYong Korando has automatic transmission and 2013 Cadillac CTS-V has manual transmission. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 SsangYong Korando will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 SsangYong Korando | 2013 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | SsangYong | Cadillac |
| Model | Korando | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 548 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 308 Nm | 747 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 103 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 92 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1865 kg | 1914 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1884 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |
