2003 Studebaker Avanti vs. 2012 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Studebaker Avanti. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Studebaker Avanti would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Studebaker Avanti is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Studebaker Avanti. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Volvo XC90 has automatic transmission and 2003 Studebaker Avanti has manual transmission. 2003 Studebaker Avanti will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo XC90 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Studebaker Avanti | 2012 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Studebaker | Volvo |
| Model | Avanti | XC90 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5665 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 240 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
