2003 Subaru Outback vs. 1967 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2003 Subaru Outback is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,738 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Sunbeam Tiger (197 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2003 Subaru Outback. (154 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru Outback. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Subaru Outback weights approximately 330 kg more than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 2003 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Subaru Outback | 1967 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Subaru | Sunbeam |
| Model | Outback | Tiger |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Roadster |
| Engine Size | 2457 cc | 4738 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 27 L |
