2003 Subaru Outback vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner

To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru Outback. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru Outback would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2003 Subaru Outback. (162 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru Outback. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 485 kg more than 2003 Subaru Outback. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru Outback. (225 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru Outback.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Subaru Outback 2004 Toyota 4Runner
Make Subaru Toyota
Model Outback 4Runner
Year Released 2003 2004
Body Type Station Wagon SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2457 cc 3950 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type boxer V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 162 HP 245 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 225 Nm 382 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 10.0:1
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1435 kg 1920 kg
Vehicle Length 4740 mm 4810 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1550 mm 1830 mm
Wheelbase Size 2660 mm 2830 mm
Fuel Consumption 6.7 L/100km 11.2 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 11.6 L/100km 13.1 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 8.5 L/100km 12.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 87 L