2003 Subaru R2 vs. 1958 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,451 cc, 1958 Toyota Master RR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Subaru R2 (62 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1958 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 should accelerate faster than 1958 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 376 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Subaru R2 | 1958 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Subaru | Toyota |
| Model | R2 | Master RR |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 658 cc | 1451 cc |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 40 HP |
| Vehicle Weight | 834 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2540 mm |
