2003 Subaru R2 vs. 1978 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Toyota Celica (86 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (62 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Toyota Celica weights approximately 125 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Toyota Celica (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (103 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1978 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Subaru R2 | 1978 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Subaru | Toyota |
| Model | R2 | Celica |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1978 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 658 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 118 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 56 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66.8 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 60 L |
