2003 Subaru R2 vs. 1979 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1979 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Toyota Celica (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Toyota Celica weights approximately 370 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1979 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (58 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1979 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Subaru R2 | 1979 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Subaru | Toyota |
Model | R2 | Celica |
Year Released | 2003 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 658 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 58 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2640 mm |