2003 Subaru R2 vs. 1980 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Zastava 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Subaru R2 (62 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 90 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Zastava 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Subaru R2 (103 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2003 Subaru R2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Subaru R2 | 1980 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Subaru | Zastava |
| Model | R2 | 1300 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 658 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3100 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2430 mm |
