2003 Subaru R2 vs. 1996 Volvo V40

To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volvo V40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volvo V40 would be higher. At 1,731 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Volvo V40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Volvo V40 (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Volvo V40 should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Volvo V40 weights approximately 430 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Volvo V40 (164 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (58 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1996 Volvo V40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Subaru R2 1996 Volvo V40
Make Subaru Volvo
Model R2 V40
Year Released 2003 1996
Body Type Hatchback Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 658 cc 1731 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 44 HP 115 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 58 Nm 164 Nm
Torque RPM 5200 RPM 4100 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 800 kg 1230 kg
Vehicle Length 3400 mm 4490 mm
Vehicle Width 1480 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1530 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2370 mm 2570 mm