2003 Subaru R2 vs. 2000 Tata Indica
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Tata Indica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Tata Indica would be higher. At 1,404 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Tata Indica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Tata Indica (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (52 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Tata Indica should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Tata Indica weights approximately 120 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Tata Indica (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (63 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2000 Tata Indica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Subaru R2 | 2000 Tata Indica | |
Make | Subaru | Tata |
Model | R2 | Indica |
Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 658 cc | 1404 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 63 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2410 mm |